1 Vs 100 Ds Again Ds

I've always been a firm believer that a computer generated Bob Saget should star in every bit many video games equally he tin. This is a universal truth that has stuck with me ever since I watched the first episode of "Full House." However, I'chiliad sorry to say that 1 vs. 100 has destroyed my unshaken faith in CG Saget: he should never star in a videogame again.
Based on the popular Telly quiz show, ane vs. 100 should have been a hard game to spiral upwards. The premise is pretty interesting: a unmarried contestant is pitted against 100 people fittingly called "the Mob." The player must keep answering questions correctly and hope that the Mob members do the opposite; thereby whittling away at them picayune by lilliputian. If yous are able to outlast all 100 members of the Mob, you get a million dollars. If you answer merely one question wrongly, you lot are chastised by a smug Saget and kicked out. There are also 3 "helps" yous can use such as eliminating ane answer, polling the Mob, or trusting the majority of the Mob.

And so far and so good, right? Well, that adept feeling will last until yous first start playing. First of all, the game has terrible pacing: there is a pause as you lot expect for a new question, a pause when you lot're waiting for the Mob to answer the question, and a break when yous confirm how many Mob members were eliminated. These pauses are attributed to the four sound samples that y'all will hear the terrifying CG Bob Saget say over and once again (while wildly gesticulating). There is no tension in the game, and then these "dramatic pauses" aren't very dramatic at all -- simply annoying.

A lack of drama is actually one of the worst things most the game. You can opt out to "accept the money" afterwards each round but doing so but leads dorsum to the main carte du jour. The money just disappears: there are no unlocks of whatever kind or any reason to accept the coin. Winning the grand prize offers empty praise from CG Saget, only that's it. Yous roughly get the aforementioned feeling from taking the money, losing all money, or winning a meg dollars.

Bob Saget'south 'oh' face.

The trivia questions themselves are varied, but skew towards popular culture (such as the proper name of Tom Cruise'due south and Katie Holmes' kid, otherwise known equally "TomKitten"...yes, it actually said "TomKitten"). In but a twelvemonth or two, a lot of these questions will exist horribly dated and irreverent. The questions are besides randomized: at that place is no difficulty setting and it's highly possible to become the aforementioned exact question twice out of three questions (this happened to me a few times). Repeating questions destroy any trivia game, and 1 vs. 100's questions repeat as much as the sound bites.

The DS version of the game likewise take two other modes called "1 vs. 100 Poker" and "Temptation" and are only moderately fun. The first mode has the player play confronting one computer actor (even though the manual lists 3 reckoner players). Each players bets on the answer they requite to a question- after ten questions, the player with the virtually money wins. "Temptation" is a variation on this, only you bet based on the category of the question. The person to bet first answers the question starting time, and if they go it incorrect, then the 2d player can answer the question (with the knowledge of Player I'southward wrong answer). The problem with this way is that information technology's easy to become way behind or manner alee: in that location's no equalizer so there tin can be situations when there's no possible mode for a player to take hold of up and win.

By at present, the just matter that could accept redeemed the game is multiplayer, but that is not very fun at all. First of all, this game requires 2 carts (which is pretty inexcusable for a quiz game that is mainly text based). In the normal mode, ane person plays as the unabridged Mob, which just means they can assign percentages to each respond. This is rather unexciting for both players (and in a twist of hilarity, I played as the Mob and lost intentionally -- the cease outcome was that I got the aforementioned win screen that my friend had!). The other modes fair a fiddling amend because both players will take to answer questions and race against each other to bet first. There's still the trouble of getting behind and staying behind though.

one vs. 100 could brand for a good videogame, merely this is not that game. The questions repeat often, there is no sense of achievement, and the multiplayer is very limited. Granted, the game is existence sold at a budget cost, just there are better quiz games out there. Avoid this one unless you absolutely need to place a CG Bob Saget in your hands.

bad

Wireless Nintendo DS iPhone Television receiver game systems Android DVD / HD Video Game

delaneyallin1942.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ign.com/articles/2008/08/01/1-vs-100-review

Share this post